0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°£È£Àü¹®´ëÇлýÀÇ Áö°¢Çü¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

A Study of the Perceptual Orientation of Junior Nursing College Students.

Àû½ÊÀÚ°£È£Àü¹®´ëÇÐ³í¹®Áý 1985³â 7±Ç 0È£ p.19 ~ 52
KMID : 0386619850070000019
±è»ç¶ó/Kim, Sa Ra

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the perceptual orientation of the nursing students, and to gather the baseline data for understanding and providing an efficient guidance of the nursing students.
The convenience samples of 540 students were drawn from one of the Nursing Junior Colleges in Seoul. The data were collected twice using the perceptual orientation scale (Choy, Chung Hoon 1980) in Sept. 1983, and in Nov. 1984.
After discarding useless ones, the data of 177 first year, 167 second year, and 143 third year students were analyzed by Pearson¢¥s Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA ), t- test, and paired t- test utilizing computer program of SAS.
The results of this study were as follows
1. Hypothesis ¥°, There will be a difference between age and perceptual orientation, supported ( F = 4.43, p < .01 ).
2. Hypothesis ¥±, There will be a difference between the place of residence and perceptual orientation, was not supported ( t = .1035, p > .05 ).
3. Hypothesis ¥² , There will be a difference between the grades and perceptual orientation, was not supported (F = .74, p > .05 ).
4. Hypothesis ¥³ , There will be a difference of perceptual orientation between the Day Class students and the Evening Class students, was supported ( t = 3.9139, p < .0001).
5. Hypothesis ¥´ , There will be a difference of perceptual orientation between before and after clinical experience, was supported ( t = 2.258, p < .05 ).
6. Hypothesis ¥µ , There will be a difference between the grades and perceptual orientation of those who have clinical experience,"was not supported ( t = .89, p > .05 ).
7. Hypothesis ¥¶, Perceptual orientation of those who choose teacher¢¥s courses as their electives will be different from those who do not, was not supported ( t = .3219, p > .05 ).
8. Hypothesis ¥·, There will be a correlation between perceptual orientation and clinical performance in the second and the third year students," was not supported ( 2nd yearr = .0119, p > .05, 3rd year : r = .081, p > .05 ).
9. Hypothesis ¥¸, " There will be a correlation between perceptual orientation and grade point average in each grade," was not supported ( 1st. year : r = .1412, p > .05, 2nd year r = .1242, p > .05, 3rd. year : r = .0059, p > .05 ).
With above results, it is concluded that
1) Perceptual orientation is differed by age.
2) Perceptual orientation is higher in the students of Evening Class than those of Day Class.
3) Perceptual orientation is influenced by the first clinical experience.
4) There shows no significant correlation between clinical experience, grade point average, and perceptual orientation.
Based on the above findings, the repeated study with different population is suggested.
KeyWords

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸